Previously, all of the various subclasses of FDroidProvider would create
their own database open helper in their respective `onCreate()` methods.
This seemed to be the cause of the multiple database locked exceptions.
Various online articles/SO posts/etc helped come to this conclusion:
* http://stackoverflow.com/a/3689883
* http://stackoverflow.com/a/8888606
* https://web.archive.org/web/20150709074733/http://www.dmytrodanylyk.com/pages/blog/concurrent-database.html
This should fix#265.
In the process, also did away with the two `read()` and `write()` methods
that returned a "readable" and "writeable" database respectively. It turns
out that it doesn't quite do what I originally thought. There is not much
benefit to specifying to the database helper that you want a readable/writeable
database. In fact, it is often the case that a call to `read()` would most
likely have returned the same instance that is returned by `write()`. The
semantics of them were therefore broken, and they've been replaced with
`db()`.
Finish main activity after navigating to AppDetails activity.
This is what used to happen before the recent refactor to the search UI.
Finishing the main activity means that it never comes back to handle the
"View this app" intent again. Instead, the main Activity just becomes an
entry point for redirecting the UI to the correct place.
Incidentally, I don't particularly like the current solution even though
it should work, and hope to come up with a better one in the future. The
reason is because the behaviour of some methods (`onCreate()` +
`handleIntent()`) is what defines the behaviour of other methods
(`checkForAddRepoIntent()`). This means it is hard to reason about the
state of the activity at any point in time. Developers need to be careful
when making changes to the `onCreate()` method because modifying it has
unintended consequences. That is what caused the problem in issue #541.
Fixes#541.
See merge request !195
This is what used to happen before the recent refactor to the search UI.
Finishing the main activity means that it never comes back to handle the
"View this app" intent again. Instead, the main Activity just becomes an
entry point for redirecting the UI to the correct place.
Incidentally, I don't particularly like the current solution even though
it should work, and hope to come up with a better one in the future. The
reason is because the behaviour of some methods (`onCreate()` +
`handleIntent()`) is what defines the behaviour of other methods
(`checkForAddRepoIntent()`). This means it is hard to reason about the
state of the activity at any point in time. Developers need to be careful
when making changes to the `onCreate()` method because modifying it has
unintended consequences. That is what caused the problem in issue #541.
Fixes#541.
Translators:
Adam Magnier French
Adrià García-Alzórriz Catalan
Adrià García-Alzórriz Spanish
Ajeje Brazorf Sardinian
Alberto Moshpirit Spanish
Dominik george French
Dominik george German
Enol Puente Asturian
Jean-Baptiste French
M2ck French
Marcelo Santana Portuguese (Brazil)
Massimiliano Caniparoli Italian
Mladen Pejaković Serbian
Nam Mai Hoang Vietnamese
naofum Japanese
Nick Bishop Greek
riotism Chinese (Hong Kong)
Sérgio Marques Portuguese (Portugal)
tacsipacsi Hungarian
ultrapeer Turkish
Андрій Бандура Ukrainian
Дмитрий Михирев Russian
Handle fdroidrepos:// urls better.
Before, it only handled the incoming `Intent` in `onResume()`. Now, it happens in `onNewIntent()` too (but ensures to only handle the same intent once).
Note the `onResume()` only ever handles the original intent, not the new intent. See inline comments for why.
Fixes#524.
See merge request !192
Before, both the swap activity and the fdroid activity would use
the "handled" key to check if an intent had been handled. This caused
problems, because by the time we got to handling the add repo intent,
it had already been "handled" by the swap activity so we bailed.
Before, it only happened in onResume(). Now, it happens in onNewIntent()
too (but ensures to only handle the same intent once).
Note the onResume() only ever handles the original intent, not the new
intent.
Fixes#524.
Create fragments appropriately in main view.
The approach to creating fragments in the constructor of the `AppListFragmentPagerAdapter`
was incorrect. Fragments are a special kind of magic, so this commit uses the approach
documented at http://stackoverflow.com/a/15261142 to make sure that the correct
fragment instances are always retrieved.
Fixes#521.
See merge request !190
Translators:
Ajeje Brazorf Sardinian
Alberto Moshpirit Spanish
hrskrs Albanian
Kalle Lampila Finnish
Mladen Pejaković Serbian
Persian: fix format strings Daniel Martí
Tobias Bannert German
Someone introduced lots of %I and and other weird format issues like %!.
Fixed all of them.
We normally catch these via Android's lint, but it appears that %I went
under its radar.
Fixes#530.
The approach to creating fragments in the constructor of the `AppListFragmentPagerAdapter`
was incorrect. Fragments are a special kind of magic, so this commit uses the approach
documented at http://stackoverflow.com/a/15261142 to make sure that the correct
fragment instances are always retrieved.
Fixes#521.
Translators:
Adrià García-Alzórriz Catalan
ageru French
Ajeje Brazorf Sardinian
Allan Nordhøy Norwegian Bokmål
Enol Puente Asturian
Erwin Scheuch-Heilig German
Karola Marky Japanese
Ldm Public French
Marcelo Santana Portuguese (Brazil)
Massimiliano Caniparoli Italian
naofum Japanese
Reiner Herrmann German
riotism Chinese (Hong Kong)
Tobias Bannert German
ultrapeer Turkish
Use custom layout for ACRA report dialog, not default one.
Styling the default dialog was difficult and it doesn't obey some
of the guidelines provided by the Android design docs:
https://www.google.com/design/spec/components/dialogs.html#dialogs-specs
(see "Content Guidelines")
This change introduces a custom dialog extending the base ACRA reporting
activity. Specifically, it introduces a padding of 24dp around the dialog
contents.
I couldn't find design specs on the specific spacing between different elements _within_ the dialog, so I used the same spacing of 20dp suggested to use between the title and the main body of the dialog.
At the very least, this change should make it easier to update styles in the future if somebody suggests improvements to the layout of the dialog.
### Before
### After
See merge request !186
Partially revert f2212e33. Make some constructors public again.
There is some code in the Android SDK using reflection to find the constructor
of one of our custom views. As such, a previous change in f2212e33 broke this
code because it made constructors package local. This partially reverts the bit
of f2212e33 which pertains to the constructors accessed using reflection.
Fixes#519.
See merge request !187
There is some code in the Android SDK using reflection to find the constructor
of one of our custom views. As such, a previous change in f2212e33 broke this
code because it made constructors package local. This partially reverts the bit
of f2212e33 which pertains to the constructors accessed using reflection.
Styling the default dialog was difficult and it doesn't obey some
of the guidelines provided by the Android design docs:
https://www.google.com/design/spec/components/dialogs.html#dialogs-specs
(see "Content Guidelines")
This change introduces a custom dialog extending the base ACRA reporting
activity. Specifically, it introduces a padding of 24dp around the dialog
contents.
