Make sure to insert, rather than update apks when updating repo.
Fixes #517. The problem was that again, only the `vercode`s of apks were being compared to see if they were the same, rather than `vercode` and `id`. The result is that some new apks will incorrectly be asked to execute an `UPDATE` query rather than an `INSERT`. As such, they don't end up in our database at all because the `UPDATE` will not run against any row at all.
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									b7eb30a69b
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						60a3804c5a
					
				| @ -160,12 +160,16 @@ public class RepoPersister { | ||||
|      * will queue up an update or an insert {@link ContentProviderOperation} for each package. | ||||
|      */ | ||||
|     private ArrayList<ContentProviderOperation> insertOrUpdateApks(List<Apk> packages) { | ||||
|         List<Apk> existingApks = ApkProvider.Helper.knownApks(context, packages, new String[]{ApkProvider.DataColumns.VERSION_CODE}); | ||||
|         String[] projection = new String[]{ | ||||
|             ApkProvider.DataColumns.APK_ID, | ||||
|             ApkProvider.DataColumns.VERSION_CODE, | ||||
|         }; | ||||
|         List<Apk> existingApks = ApkProvider.Helper.knownApks(context, packages, projection); | ||||
|         ArrayList<ContentProviderOperation> operations = new ArrayList<>(packages.size()); | ||||
|         for (Apk apk : packages) { | ||||
|             boolean exists = false; | ||||
|             for (Apk existing : existingApks) { | ||||
|                 if (existing.vercode == apk.vercode) { | ||||
|                 if (existing.id.equals(apk.id) && existing.vercode == apk.vercode) { | ||||
|                     exists = true; | ||||
|                     break; | ||||
|                 } | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user
	 Peter Serwylo
						Peter Serwylo